Did you know that I’m a math nerd? I’m no wonk, but I went pretty far in my studies before flipping out (number theory). I never really appreciated my mathematics intuition as a kid, but as a grownup, the knack has helped me shortcut a great many problems (money management, mapmaking, making interdisciplinary leaps: carrying capacity equilibrium can be expressed as a formula!).
So it will then come as no surprise that the way I order my aspirational list of corporate values is as a set of rotating circular pentagonal intersecting sets. Okay, okay: it’s still a surprise.* Just think of it like a Spirograph. If you rotate a sequence of circles around another circle and you get a Spirograph. I rotated five circles around a central circle and dropped the outermost edge. Then I assigned a shortlist of related principles to each section. The outermost principles intersect to generate the interior principles (e.g. Integrity ∩ Arete = Accomplishment). I had a tiered values list sketched out in my head but I thought, I bet I can represent this idea in a way that indirectly calls on the lotus characterization of the noble eightfold path. I was probably also inspired by Indexed.
Here goes. You can click on the image below to pop up a larger version.

First tier principles:
- Integrity
- Arete
- Sustainability
- Family²
- Wisdom
- Accomplishment = Integrity ∩ Arete
- Vision = Arete ∩ Sustainability
- Diversity = Sustainability ∩ Family
- Creativity³ = Family ∩ Wisdom
- Fit Judgment⁴ = Wisdom ∩ Integrity
Third tier principles:
- Passion = Integrity ∩ Arete ∩ Sustainability
- Optimism = Arete ∩ Sustainability ∩ Family
- Stewardship = Sustainability ∩ Family ∩ Wisdom
- Agility = Family ∩ Wisdom ∩ Integrity
- Transparency˚˚ = Wisdom ∩ Integrity ∩ Arete
˚˚ For all the harping I do on honesty, I didn't include it in the fifteen principles. Transparency under the auspice of Integrity necessarily assumes and includes honesty as a core value. There's actually quite a lot of that going on in the diagram. I wrote out more than five dozen candidates for inclusion. Many were eliminated after being subsumed by the relational implications of the fifteen finalist principles.
¹ There seems to be no consensus on whether it is pentalateral or pentilateral. Google shows more hits for the former, so that's what I went with. In the off chance anyone cares.
² I mean "family" in the sense of a close-knit unit that shares a common goal and endeavors to protect one another. I do mean to also imply the weathering of various minor snits.
³ This is the only one that I think is patently unintuitive. Thoughts?
⁴I do not like the phrase “fit judgment” but have yet to settle on a suitable synonym.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi folks. Thanks for commenting. I'm not allowing anonymous comments for a number of reasons. There are practical reasons such as bot blocking. And there are philosophical reasons such as consideration that if you are unwilling to sign your name to what you're writing, it probably indicates that you shouldn't be writing it to begin with. Naturally, there are exceptions. If your salient post requires anonymity, send me your comment directly at yugamae@gmail.com and I'll consider posting it on your behalf under the anonymity stipulations you propose in the message.